Lives versus Livelihoods? Perceived economic risk has a stronger association with support for COVID-19 preventive measures than perceived health risk

 This paper examines whether compliance with COVID-19 mitigation measures is motivated by wanting to save lives or save the economy (or both), and which implications this carries to fight the pandemic. National representative samples were collected from 24 countries (N = 25,435). The main predictors were (1) perceived risk to contract coronavirus, (2) perceived risk to suffer economic losses due to coronavirus, and (3) their interaction effect. Individual and country-level variables were added as covariates in multilevel regression models. We examined compliance with various preventive health behaviors and support for strict containment policies. Results show that perceived economic risk consistently predicted mitigation behavior and policy support—and its effects were positive. Perceived health risk had mixed effects. Only two significant interactions between health and economic risk were identified—both positive.

Editorial: Nature Research

Journal: Scientific Reports

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88314-4

Enlaces adicionales: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-88314-4


Comentarios

Entradas populares de este blog

Exportación de muebles de madera hacia el mercado de los Estados Unidos de Norteamérica

Propuesta para el incremento de consumo de café tostado de los asociados de la Junta Nacional del Café

Propuesta de una arquitectura empresarial para el proceso gestión de operaciones de la Compañía de Seguros de Vida Cámara